AN EVENING AT THE SAN FRANCISCO SILENT FILM FESTIVAL–Review of “Die Frau, nach der man sich sehnt” (A Woman Men Yearn For)

 

Last night I went to the Castro Theatre to see “Die Frau, nach der man sich sehnt” (A Woman Men Yearn For), part of the San Francisco Silent Film Festival that started on Thursday and is going on through tonight. Due to lack of finances, I have not been able to attend until now, but I’m glad that such a quality film was my first taste of this year’s film showings. The Castro boasts many festivals, including this one, the Jewish Film Festival, and the LGBT Film Festival, among others. This was my first experience at the Silent Film Festival, as the tickets are often so expensive that I have to pass them up due to inability to pay. This particular movie cost $17, for example. Steep, but I was willing to pay it for the opportunity to see this early Marlene Dietrich film, which proved to be a real beauty.

I love Marlene Dietrich. I find her to be on par with Garbo as one of the most mysterious and ethereally beautiful women ever to grace the screen. Though Marlene was not classically pretty, she knew how to work the lighting to her advantage, keeping her head at such an angle as to minimize the visibility of her turned-up nose and accentuate her more positive features. In my opinion, her large, expressive eyes are the most stunning part of her. She can say everything with a glance, and in most of her movies she drives men wild with desire just by giving them that glance. In this movie, Marlene is a woman with a secret–she and her lover, Dr. Karoff, are on a train escaping a crime they have committed, when Marlene’s character, Stascha, meets another man on the train, Henri. This man is on a honeymoon with his wife, whom he married to save the family business. He doesn’t particularly love her, though she seems to be a sweet person who loves him a great deal. Henri first catches a glimpse of Stascha through a train window covered in frost.

This is an absolutely beautiful scene. Not only is it the first time we see Marlene Dietrich in the film, but as we gaze at her, the frost on the window begins to slowly melt away. It is as if she is giving off some kind of intense heat, and though her face reflects an air of tragedy, we can see that in her own way, this woman is powerful. Henri is immediately smitten, and can’t take his eyes off her. Eventually they meet in the train, and Henri is putty in her hands. We see him basically clamor to her, rushing over to her to light her cigarette and generally being completely in awe of her. Stascha begs him to help her get away from her lover, and when Dr. Karoff discovers them, Stascha claims that Henri is her cousin. It becomes clear that there is a problem between them, but Dr. Karoff pulls Stascha off the train at the next stop, and Henri is left with his feelings of lust for her. It becomes too much for him to take, and he jumps off the train to follow her, forsaking his wife who is left in their train compartment heartbroken and crying.

Henri is captivated by Stascha.

You really feel for the wife in this movie. It is clear that she is a sweet woman who loves her husband dearly, she is affectionate and loving toward him and just seems like a wonderful girl. When he leaves her in the train, the audience’s heart just breaks for her, and yet understands why this man, acting on his lust and primitive instincts, might do such a terrible thing as to suddenly leave his wife like that. We never do learn what happens to the wife, she sort of disappears from the movie after that scene.

Stascha does everything in her power to keep seeing Henri, but Dr. Karoff is on to them. It is in this scene that we learn their secret–they have killed a man, and the police are on their tail. Stascha and Henri fall completely in love, and at one point Henri and Dr. Karoff get into a knock-down, all-out fight over Stascha. At the end of the movie, the police find them, and Stascha finally tells Henri the secret. The audience learns that not only have they killed a man, but the man was Stascha’s husband, and Stascha went along with the murder. The film ends with the police accosting them, and at the last minute, Dr. Karoff commits another murder. I won’t tell you who it is.

There is one beautiful scene, in which all three lead characters are at a New Year’s Eve party, that I think is masterfully executed. The cinematography is brilliant, with lots of very long shots (one in particular that lasts for about 1 minute) and closeups of Dietrich’s tragic expression, juxtaposed with the joy of the party. It is the cinematography of this movie that is really its saving grace, as the plot is kind of hard to follow. The fact that there are very few title cards is both compelling and confusing–nearly everything is said through the expressions of the actors, and while it makes for a beautiful piece of artistry, the plot suffers. There are a few shots that really stuck out to me, in addition to the New Year’s Eve party, there is a shot at the beginning of the inside of a steel-making machine, and the camera is positioned in such a way that it looks as though the hammer inside the machine is coming right toward the audience. A great use of the camera, and pretty advanced for 1929, I say.

I would definitely see this movie for its beauty. Not only the beauty of the camerawork and cinematography, but also of the actors. Everyone is stunning–even Dr. Karoff, who is technically the villain, has a certain charm about him. I think he looks very much like Laurence Olivier circa 1957. You may have trouble following the plot, but eventually everything becomes pretty clear. I had an enjoyable experience.

Tonight I’m going back to see He Who Gets Slapped, starring Norma Shearer, John Gilbert, and Lon Chaney. This one should be great.

Backlots is now on Twitter!

Subscribe and follow all the latest posts, at the username backlotsfilm. See you there! Thanks for reading, everyone!

GINGER ROGERS CENTENARY BIRTHDAY TRIBUTE

Ginger Rogers would have been 100 years old today. In honor of this immensely multi-talented star of stage and screen, I am putting together a humble birthday tribute to say a posthumous thank you to a woman who quite literally gave her heart and soul to the film industry.

I will start by saying that I consider Ginger Rogers to be massively underestimated as a screen star. Ask anyone on the street who Ginger Rogers was, and you’ll get a response like “Fred’s dancing partner!” In a sense, I think it was a curse that Ginger became known as just one of “Fred and Ginger,” because it isolated her in the eyes of the public. If Ginger had a flaw, it was that she was TOO talented. She was a master at everything. People who have too many talents tend to get either smothered completely by their own talent, or become known for one thing and the rest of their potential goes down the drain. The relative anonymity of Kay Thompson today is an example of someone being smothered by their own talent, I think–and Ginger is an example of the latter. The public can’t handle that much talent from a single person, and don’t know where to focus their energy, so either one thing takes center stage, or nothing at all.

She was born Virginia Katherine McMath in Independence, Missouri, and was raised by her mother and stepfather (John Logan Rogers) in Fort Worth, Texas. She took the last name of her stepfather as a child, and as one of her young cousins couldn’t pronounce “Virginia,” she became “Ginger.” Her mother, Lela, had worked as a scriptwriter and had a real passion for Hollywood, one that she passed on to her daughter–Ginger grew up with the theatre, and soon fell in love with it.

Ginger with her mother, Lela Rogers.

After winning a Charleston dance contest at the age of 15, she was given the opportunity to join a vaudeville traveling act, and traveled with them for 6 months. At the age of 18 she made her Broadway debut in a play called Top Speed, which was followed by a starring role in the musical Girl Crazy, which garnered her rave reviews and a seven year contract with Paramount Pictures.

The Paramount contract didn’t really work out, and she garnered a number of other, smaller contracts, including those with Warner Brothers and Pathé. She made a significant impression at the Warner Brothers studio with 42nd Street and Gold Diggers of 1933 (a personal favorite of mine), but it was at RKO that Ginger would make her biggest mark. She was paired with Fred Astaire in Flying Down to Rio in 1933, which was followed by 8 other films together at that studio (The Barkleys of Broadway, their 10th and last film together, was made at MGM in 1949). Here are some moments from those films:

“The Carioca,” from Flying Down to Rio, (1933)

“The Continental,” from The Gay Divorcée, (1934)

“Smoke Gets In Your Eyes,” from Roberta (1935)

“Cheek to Cheek,” from Top Hat (1935)

“Let Yourself Go,” from Follow the Fleet (1936)

“Pick Yourself Up,” from Swing Time (1936)

“Let’s Call the Whole Thing Off,” from Shall We Dance (1937)

“The Yam,” from Carefree (1938)

“Waiting for the Robert E. Lee,” from The Story of Vernon and Irene Castle (1939)

“Bouncin’ the Blues,” The Barkleys of Broadway ( 1949)

It was also with RKO that Ginger made Kitty Foyle in 1940, the film that would showcase her talent as a dramatic actress as well as a dancer and comedienne. The story of a woman torn between two men, Ginger proved to the world that she was more than just the musical counterpart to Fred Astaire. She garnered an Academy Award nomination, and won for the Best Actress of 1940.

Ginger and James Stewart pose with their Oscars, February 27, 1941.

As the 1950’s approached and McCarthyism began to rise in the United States, Ginger was one of the few people in Hollywood to show strong support toward McCarthy’s policies. A lifelong Republican, she held views that were not in line with those of many of her close friends (Katharine Hepburn, Lucille Ball, and Bette Davis, to name a few), but nonetheless, Rogers was known for being a good and loyal friend, and was well-loved within Hollywood. It has been said that Ginger herself may not have been as conservative as she said she was–but instead put on that face for her mother, to whom she was very close and who was a staunch supporter of McCarthy.

Though her career declined as roles for older women became harder to find, Ginger still managed to find work in smaller films and on Broadway, notably replacing Carol Channing as Dolly Levi in Hello, Dolly! in 1965. She made a number of television appearances, acting right up until her death of congestive heart failure in 1995.

From an appearance on “The Lucy Show,” with her good friend (and distant cousin) Lucille Ball. The young girl is Lucie Arnaz.

Ginger spent her last years in ill health, confined to a wheelchair due to a fall on the stairway of Ronald Reagan’s yacht. A number of strokes did not help. It’s sad to think of the great Ginger Rogers in a wheelchair, but I guess it’s some consolation that her movies are still around and keep her alive and well in our minds.

I leave you with one of my favorite moments of hers, from Gold Diggers of 1933. Happy 100th birthday, Ginger!!

“Uncle Tom’s Cabin” Ballet Sequence, The King and I (1956)

Lying around daydreaming about movies the other day (as I tend to do), I began to think about The King and I, a movie I last saw at the Maureen O’Hara Classic Film Festival last month, and just how much I love one particular sequence in the movie. In a film that I think is chock full of quality numbers, the scene in which the servants of the king stage a Siamese version of Uncle Tom’s Cabin may be one of the most beautiful scenes ever put on film. Its use of traditional Siamese (Thai) garments, music, and dance to tell the classic story of slaves in the American Civil War is not only a clever idea within the context of the movie, but is also immensely symbolic and serves to highlight recurring themes in both stories about tolerance, equality, and freedom.

Rodgers and Hammerstein never shied away from controversial themes in their work. South Pacific, the musical that directly preceded The King and I on Broadway, dealt with many of the same issues–including interracial relationships and the importance of tolerance–ones that would become very important politically in the coming decades. Though The King and I is less direct than South Pacific in its addressing of social issues, Rodgers and Hammerstein get their message across just the same through graceful innuendo about the love between Anna and the King, more than hinting that it may be a bigger emotion they feel for each other than just friendship. Take this famous scene for example:

The King and Anna start out friendly, then around the 3:00 mark, it starts to border on romance. By 4:10, all bets are off.

It is no surprise, then, that Rodgers and Hammerstein would choose to incorporate Uncle Tom’s Cabin, the controversial anti-slavery book by Harriet Beecher Stowe, into this play. The book is viewed as crucial in shifting views of slavery in the American South, and likewise in the play, the production of the Uncle Tom’s Cabin ballet threatens the power of the king, ultimately diminishing his power against the slave Tuptim.

The symbolism of this number is far-reaching and multi-layered. The relationship to the slavery embedded in the story of The King and I is evident, and its relation to the overarching social awareness of Rodgers and Hammerstein has already been addressed. But I think it is fitting that the movie was made in the era that it was. In 1956, segregation had just been outlawed, and anger was rampant throughout the country. This scene shows tolerance and love on a global scale, as though Rodgers and Hammerstein were speaking directly to the American public and telling them us all that we should learn a lesson from what we’re seeing.

VIVIEN LEIGH AND LAURENCE OLIVIER APPRECIATION BLOGATHON–The Cleopatra Plays and Vivien Leigh’s Second Oscar

On May 10, 1951, Vivien Leigh and Laurence Olivier opened their first performance of George Bernard Shaw’s Caesar and Cleopatra, part of their effort to perform that play and Shakespeare’s Antony and Cleopatra simultaneously, on alternating nights, at the St. James Theatre in London. Vivien had long wanted to play Cleopatra, and the plays were well-covered in the press, including a spread in LIFE magazine on December 17, 1951. By that time, the plays had closed in London and Leigh and Olivier had taken it to New York for a Broadway run at the Ziegfeld Theatre. Performances were just about to begin when the spread was issued.

 

 

 

 

 

And for the purposes of the blogathon, I am repeating an article I posted a few months ago following the Weekend With the Oliviers event. The article appeared in the March 29-April 5 issue of Paris Match magazine in 1952, and I have translated it from the French.

 

IN HER BROADWAY DRESSING ROOM, VIVIEN LEIGH RECEIVES HER SECOND OSCAR

By our special New York correspondent, Georges Pernoud

When reporters from the American press were admitted into Vivien Leigh’s dressing room at the Ziegfeld Theatre, an extraordinary event occurred: silence.

Where the press (specifically the American press) go, she usually expresses an energetic cooperative mood that would shock criminals and enchant politicians. This evening, though, in her small dressing room with mirrors covered in face powder, it was a different story. It was the usual tabloid braggarts, with their cigarette butts flattened on their lips, their felt pens and their hand-painted neckties, who seemed sheepish in front of their hosts. And it was the usual victims, Sir Laurence Olivier and Mrs. Olivier in this case, who had the upper hand. Dressed in dark gray with faint stripes, his coat halfway open to reveal a golden chain, impeccable from head to toe, Olivier stepped aside with the rigidity of an obelisk before the queen of Egypt, dressed in a black satin gown with a mischievous smile on a slightly weary face,  a bit too human without the effects of stage makeup and less striking than her two sets of three-string pearls , one set on her neck, the other on her wrist.

It was midnight. The curtain had long since fallen on the giant sphinx (5 m. 50 high and 4 wide), to the feet where Vivien Leigh dies of love three times a week, in the last scene of Antony and Cleopatra by Shakespeare. And at which, the other three nights of the week, she expresses her love for Caesar in the first scene of Caesar and Cleopatra by Bernard Shaw.

This evening, upon returning to her dressing room, Vivien learned that she had just won the 1952 Best Actress Oscar for her role of Blanche, the fallen coquette in Elia Kazan’s A Streetcar Named Desire by Tennessee Williams. Journalists had been waiting for an hour in the wings of the Ziegfeld Theatre–the doors to Vivien’s dressing room were not opened until Vivien and her husband, Laurence Olivier, had finished washing the stage makeup off their faces and were ready to greet them properly attired.

“Maybe these gentlemen would like to drink something?” Vivien asked her publicity agent, Richard Maney, who agreed. This provoked a hustle and bustle among the reporters.

The glass having been broken, the photographers began their duties. “Would you like to kiss your wife?” one cameraman asked Olivier. Silently acquiescing, Olivier wrapped his arm around Vivien’s shoulders and gave her a peck on the cheek. “A big one!” protested the unauthorized photographers. Ever docile, Sir Laurence repeated the gesture, and considering his duty to the image-hunters done, he turned toward the reporters. Vivien served the drinks.

-”What effect does your second Oscar have on you, Miss Leigh?”

-”Exactly the same as the first one.”

-”What does that mean?”

-”I am humbled and honored.”

Apart from being rather a world unto itself, it is impossible to distinguish from her smile what her genuine mood is, and what is simply glamor.

-”And you, Mr. Olivier?”

-”He has three.”

Sir Laurence played with his golden chain.

-”And what do you do with them?”

-”We use them as table lamps,” said Laurence Olivier. “You see, we are very conventional people.”

Vivian approves absent-mindedly–”That’s right, they’re used as bookends.”

-”May I drive my wife home?” Olivier says abruptly, with a weary smile.

The camera flashes illuminated in the London couple a light of tragedy.

-”Bookends or lamps?”

-”May I drive my wife home?” repeated Sir Laurence, seriously. “You see, we are very conventional people.”

Outside the Ziegfeld, a taxi was waiting.While the journalists finished their drinks inside, Laurence and Vivien embraced each other as lovers. Behind the windows, at each entrance of the theatre, two large photographs shone in the lights of 6th Avenue. To the left, a sixteen-year-old Cleopatra, resembling Scarlett O’Hara, smiled at Caesar, while on the right, a forty-something Cleopatra gazed at Antony with a sad expression, recalling that of Blanche.

This couple is more difficult to approach than the royal family and even slight intimacies necessitate a retreat on horseback to their old abbey between Oxfordshire and Hertfordshire, Yet they are near slaves to the public, both of them having been born for the theatre. She came to the theatre through a longer route than he, but Vivien herself has said that ever since childhood, she has had no greater ambition than to become an actress. They apparently met by the merest of chances: waiting for a taxi at the door of the Savoy on a rainy day.

HOLLYWOOD PAYS FOR SHAKESPEARE

But Vivien’s destiny seemed to advance in zigzags. Nothing would suggest her status as a future movie star when she married barrister Herbert Leigh Holman in 1931–Vivien was 18, and had attended a few courses at the Dramatic Academy in London. But her strict education in an English convent between the ages of 5 and 14, then in a boarding house run by an austere Bavarian baron near Munich, had prepared her more than anything for the role of tender bourgeoise housewife. The end result was her leaving the marriage after 5 years, shortly after the birth of her daughter, Suzanne.

It was then that the theatre began to swirl in this Irish head, that came into existence under the Indian sun (her father was a senior officer in a cavalry regiment, stationed in Darjeeling in 1913). Vivien, in the calm of her London home, began to recall her childhood dreams.

When Mrs. Leigh Holman secretly met with a theatre director one day, he cast her right on the spot. The success of her first play, The Mask of Virtue,transformed the life of Mrs. Leigh Holman (who took her husband’s second first name as her stage name)–a nurse began to replace her duties in the care of little Suzanne, and at this point the two spouses were speaking only through correspondence. Each evening, Vivien left a ticket on her husband’s desk. She found another upon her return from the theatre, as the lawyer rose early and went to bed early.  And when Alexander Korda signed Vivien to a contract of 50,000 pounds per year, Mrs. Holman was effectively just Vivien. The divorce was finalized in 1939.

Within months, David Selznick, having embarked upon the most expensive production in Hollywood’s history, was searching in vain for a Scarlett, for that to which we now refer in cinematic capitals: GWTW (Gone With the Wind). Vivien went to California. Shooting had already begun on Gone with the Wind(they refer to it here by its French title, Autant en emporte le vent)and Vivien was invited to attend what would be the key scene in the film–the burning of Atlanta. As she was watching this tremendous scene, that of a city on fire, an assistant director named Fleming silently went over to Selznick and pulled on his sleeve.  He pointed at Vivien’s anguished and radiant face, a face that was the living image of Scarlett O’Hara…

It was then that Selznick decided to cast  Miss Leigh on the spot, for the best woman’s role in the history of cinema.

Between Gone With the Wind and Streetcar (her two Oscars) there was Shakespeare. Vivien’s career, like that of Laurence Olivier, is one of nearly all superstar roles, and Vivien always accepted popular roles to offset the costs of the difficult plays she wanted to perform. When Laurence Olivier brought her to Denmark to play in Hamlet on the desolate terraces of Elsinore, for a privileged audience of 500 people, she signed to play in Waterloo Bridge upon her return, opposite Robert Taylor. Anna Karenina paved the way for Romeo and Juliet. And Cleopatra, with the veritable Caesar of a producer/director Gilbert Miller, only brought in the $75,000 that Cleopatra cost, that the years of performances at the tiny St. James Theatre in London, would barely cover.

The St. James Theatre is closed, in its own way, like the Oliviers’ country house Notley Abbey. It is at this theater that Olivier cut his teeth as a director and to which the list of those invited included Anouilh, Menotti, and soon Marivaux and Claudel introduced by Jean-Louis Barrault and Madeleine Renaud, and was the permanent home of Shakespeare.

The daily life of the number 1 couple of the English stage? It is that of all the heros of the theatre. A friend of the Oliviers, the critic Alan Dant, told me of a few times, upon coming to spend the weekend at Notley Abbey, seeing one or the other of them gesticulating with a sublime furor, hurling invectives against an invisible enemy. In other moments, you would see Sir Laurence doing imitations, telling stories of the theatre. He made Churchill laugh hysterically one day by telling him a story of Lucien Guitry and Sacha, when he was little–”They saw a blind beggar, and Lucien gave a sou to his son to put in the beggar’s collection bowl. ‘You should have tipped your hat,’ said Lucien. ‘We must be polite to beggars.’ ‘But papa, he is blind.’ ‘And what if he were an imposter?’”

NECK TOO LONG, HANDS TOO BIG, VOICE TOO SMALL

The Oliviers have few intimate friends: Danny Kaye, Orson Welles, and Noel Coward (at whose Santa Barbara home they married in 1940) are the only ones with famous names.

If their passion for the theatre is exclusive, their tastes are diverse. For Vivien: gardening, canasta, Charles Dickens, and Siamese cats. For Laurence: Handel, and Bourgogne wine.

Vivien is 37. She fiercely guards her beauty secrets, and only one person knows her secret number 1: her mother, Gertrude Hartley, who had a beauty salon in Knightsbridge that she closed to devote herself to one client, Vivien.

-My neck is too long, my hands are too big, and my voice is too small,” Vivien said one day. Her dresser, Audrey Cruddas, is responsible for the neck. For hours, Vivien lets her dress her neck until her head and her shoulders are proportioned correctly. Her voice demanded, and still demands, patient exercises and causes her constant worries about her vocal cords. In regard to her hands: “I have learned,” she says, ” from a great actress, Ellen Terry, that one should never cover large hands. People notice much more when you try to cover them, than they do if you leave them bare.”

The public, although much more fabulous and more in charge of the prestige of superstars, who are not superstars in their own eyes, Vivien is sometimes “fed up,” she says disgustedly. Despite a weak constitution, she always chooses exhausting roles. The hysterical Blanche of Streetcar that she played for months in London, seriously affected her health.

Sometimes, when the audience is not enthusiastic, the actors close to her hear Vivien grumble curse words that are anything but classical.

To an admirer who saw her die on stage the other evening and said to her “You are the most beautiful Antony and Cleopatra that we have seen since Antony and Cleopatra themselves,” she replied: “Yes, darling, and we are almost as tired.”

4TH OF JULY MOVIE REVIEW: To The Shores of Tripoli (1942)

Well everyone, first off I would like to wish you and yours a very safe and happy holiday today, with lots of good food, good celebration, and warm summer weather! My family is off to Sonoma today for a picnic, but first I would like to post a short movie review of a film related to the U.S. for the holiday.

You guessed it, this movie is about World War II. Endless wartime propaganda films were made during the war, and To The Shores of Tripoli is no exception. It actually began as simply an examination of war, but as the bombing of Pearl Harbor occurred during filming, they changed the tone of the movie to reflect the growing need for military enlistment in the face of American participation in the war.

The movie concerns itself with a young soldier (John Payne) who falls in love with a Navy nurse (Maureen O’Hara), but under military non-fraternization policy, they are not allowed to….well, fraternize. He keeps on her though, and it gets him in trouble with his girlfriend back home. He eventually leaves the Marines, but back home he learns of Pearl Harbor and re-enlists. The end.

I would say that this is a pretty typical wartime propaganda movie, though probably better than most. I don’t generally like these movies, I find them rather contrived and silly, and I can’t honestly say that I like To the Shores of Tripoli. I enjoy all the actors in it, and it’s fun to see Maureen O’Hara and John Payne acting together a number of years before their famous pairing in Miracle on 34th Street. The plot is hard to follow and not too well-conceived, but the photography is incredible. This was the first movie Maureen O’Hara shot in Technicolor, and she is absolutely stunning.

Beautiful .gif file from the movie.

Anyway, I’m off to prepare for the picnic, but I hope everyone has a great 4th of July!

DUAL BIRTHDAY SPAMS–#1: Leslie Caron

July 1 produces great Hollywood stars. Tomorrow (or today in France, where both birthday girls reside) is the birthday of two film legends–Leslie Caron (born 1931) and Olivia de Havilland (born a whopping 1916).

As I know I’m going to get carried away about Olivia and basically write an entire novel about how wonderful she is, I’m going to start with Leslie Caron and save my energy for Livvie tomorrow, when I hopefully won’t be so jetlagged.

I find Leslie Caron to be a vastly underrated performer. A trained ballet dancer, I think she was often misused in roles that may not have been correct for her. I am going to wish her a happy birthday by showcasing some of her phenomenal dancing scenes, as well as some roles that I think she fit very well.

Her first film, the brilliant An American in Paris, 1951.

Daddy Long Legs, 1958.

Lili, 1953. One of my all-time favorite movies, and the one that introduced me to classic film at age 4. I will always be grateful to Leslie Caron for that.

Dance sequence in Lili.

I recently finished Leslie Caron’s autobiography, and she seems like a truly great person as well as a marvelous star. I wish I had been able to go to her Bed and Breakfast when I was in France, because how cool would that have been?

Happy birthday Leslie Caron!!

Paris in Hollywood

As I am currently waiting at the airport to go back to the United States after a 5-month adventure in Paris, my last hurrah to Paris before I return is a post on Paris in film. This is a truly magnificent city, and deserves every ounce of the respect it has been afforded in film. Here are a few notable scenes dealing with the city. I love you, Paris, and I will always have you.

An American in Paris, 1951. One of Vincente Minnelli’s masterpieces, the film follows a struggling American artist in Paris by the name of Jerry Mulligan, played by Gene Kelly, and his adventures in life and love in the city. Winning 6 Academy Awards and ranking high on the AFI’s list of the 100 best movies of all time, this is a necessary inclusion in a post about Paris in film. In this scene, Jerry entertains a group of children on the street in Paris (well, a replica on the MGM backlot).

Funny Face, 1957. A well-known film among Audrey Hepburn fans, this charming musical about the fashion world takes place predominantly in Paris. This song is sung just after the arrival of the characters in the city, and although much of it is rather corny, it’s a sweet tribute to Paris. Although the film stars Audrey Hepburn and Fred Astaire, I think that the film really belongs to the magnificent Kay Thompson, who steals the show away from them as a supporting actress.

Obviously. Casablanca, 1942. Though the vast majority of the movie takes place in Morocco, the entire film is basically a love letter to Paris. Ilsa Lund and Rick Blaine began a whirlwind love affair in Paris, and it is the city that kept them together, drove them apart, and then finally got them together again at the very end when Rick famously tells Ilsa “We’ll always have Paris.” I don’t have to go into the brilliance of this film, its immortality speaks for itself.

Gigi, 1958. Based on a Broadway play, this screen version of Colette’s classic novel is probably most well-known for Maurice Chevalier’s singing “Thank Heaven for Little Girls,” and providing American audiences with the stereotypical view of Paris. Leslie Caron is marvelous in the part, even though she was far older than Gigi was supposed to be.

Meanwhile, Lucy goes to Paris and wreaks havoc.

Gentlemen Prefer Blondes, 1953. In this scene, both Marilyn and Jane Russell have had falling-outs with their men, and having arrived in Paris, sing this song.

Gay Purr-ee, 1962. This animated story of two cats in Paris stars Judy Garland and Robert Goulet.

The Maureen O’Hara Classic Film Festival–June 17-26 in Glengarriff, County Cork, Ireland.

I flew to Ireland on June 15 and spent the week at the Maureen O’Hara Classic Film Festival, in a small town called Glengarriff, County Cork–the home of Maureen O’Hara herself. It was an absolutely wonderful week, filled with many great films (we watched 3 classic movies per day) and marvelous guests, including Maureen O’Hara, Rory Flynn (daughter of Errol), Susan Bernard (daughter of photographer George Bernard) and Pat Shamroy-Shaw (daughter of the celebrated cinematographer Leon Shamroy). I had a great time, and didn’t want it to end! It is so rare that we young classic film fans meet like-minded individuals our own age, and I was lucky enough to be sharing a house with a fabulous 6 of them. It was an experience I truly treasure.

I met Maureen O’Hara and all the other special guests, and I can tell you that Maureen is one tough and feisty lady! She does use a wheelchair now, but other than that, you would never know she was 90. She has all her faculties, and is as sassy and smart as ever. She signed my copy of “Tis Herself,” and it was an honor to meet such a Hollywood legend.

Here are some pictures.

The movies we saw.

With Maureen O'Hara.

I was obsessed with this poster.

With Rory Flynn, the daughter of Errol Flynn.

Joan and Olivia were placed next to each other on the wall. Awkward.

 

Rainbow over the hotel where the festival was held.

Whimsical Wednesday–Jack Lemmon