Challenges to the Production Code in “Suddenly Last Summer” (1959)

Katharine Hepburn and Elizabeth Taylor struggle with the mysterious death of Sebastian, Hepburn’s son and Taylor’s cousin in “Suddenly Last Summer.”

The works of Tennessee Williams are notorious for their stark dealings with sensitive subjects. Prostitution, incest, adultery, and homosexuality were regular themes in his works, and yet, interestingly, despite the strict production code in place from 1934 to 1968, his were some of the most frequently adapted plays in classic Hollywood. Williams’ plays have been held in high esteem by Hollywood directors, who often had to invent creative means by which to sneak the “immoral” material past the censors, who would veto any outright mention of behavior going against mainstream Christian values. From A Streetcar Named Desire (1951) to Cat on a Hot Tin Roof (1958) and Night of the Iguana (1961), the movies have nearly all become giants of cinema, due in large part to the source material and the skill of the directors in conveying meaning in subtle ways.

After years of gradual erosion, the 1950’s saw films that tested the code outright, questioning the values set down by Joseph Breen in 1934. Suddenly Last Summer (1959), directed by the great Joseph L. Mankiewicz, was a direct hit at those values, barely veiling the original intent of Tennessee Williams in the stage version.

Violet Venable (Katharine Hepburn) is a New Orleans woman who lost her son, Sebastian, in a mysterious accident the summer before. The only person who knows what happened is Violet’s niece, Catherine (Elizabeth Taylor) who is confined to a sanitarium after going insane after the incident. A kindly doctor (Montgomery Clift) who is a specialist on frontal lobotomies is summoned by Violet to analyze her niece for the procedure. He visits Catherine, who likes and trusts him, and when Violet and Catherine get together with the doctor, it is clear that they have animosity. Catherine begins to verbally attack Violet, and in doing so, a portion of Sebastian’s life becomes clear. Slowly, a story begins to emerge of a mother who loved her son intensely and obsessively, and a young man who used his mother and cousin to attract the attention of men.

Confronting Violet.

The subject of what is termed “sexual perversion” was explicitly prohibited in the production code, with the inference of prohibition on the subject of homosexuality and incest, both of which, of course, are central to this story. With dialogue such as this bit, seen in the trailer at the bottom of the page, the audience is left to extract the meaning, which is inherently clear.

CATHERINE: Sebastian only needed you while you were still useful.

DOCTOR: Useful?

CATHERINE: I mean young. Able to attract.

VIOLET: She’s babbling again. Babbling and lying.

CATHERINE: He left her home because she–

VIOLET: Because you stole him!

CATHERINE:–lost her attractiveness!

DOCTOR: What does attractiveness have to do with the son and the mother?

CATHERINE: You see, Doctor…we were both decoys.

Though the subject of homosexuality was not new to cinema, appearing notably, though in in extremely subdued ways, in such movies as Gilda (1946) and Rebel Without a Cause (1955), up until this point it is rarely stated as explicitly as in this film. Catherine’s statement “We were both decoys” all but says to the audience, and the censors, “Sebastian was interested in men.” The fact that it was not cut out, nor the film shut down altogether, is a testament to the weathering of the power of the censors over a film’s content.

One of the final scenes, in which we are privy to the actual circumstances of Sebastian’s death, is quite disturbing, and features Catherine recounting in total graphic detail what happened. This scene is noteworthy in that the character is telling us exactly what circumstances led to her cousin’s death, but the visuals are left to the imagination. What we see is a mild, watered-down version of Catherine’s story, and what we imagine is much worse. In that sense, the scene runs much like it would onstage, and this was, perhaps, Mankiewicz’s way of creatively evading the censors.

Sebastian’s death.

The reception of the film initially was mostly negative. Tennessee Williams denounced the writing and thought Elizabeth Taylor was a horrible choice for Catherine. However, both Taylor and Hepburn went on to Academy Award nominations for their work, and today the film is seen as a great showcase of the talents of both these screen legends.

Suddenly Last Summer plays relatively often on TCM, and it is certainly an interesting film to watch as one that stretches the bounds of the restrictive production code. It is a must-see for fans of any of the three stars, and it keeps you on the edge of your seat for the entirety of the intensely raw story.

That’s all for Cinecon, folks!

Hello readers, well, Cinecon has come to a close! My apologies to those who received my latest blog post this morning, for some reason my computer was not uploading things properly and I’m afraid that a faulty post ended up in many of your inboxes. I am still trying to work out some of the logistics of getting my photos and audio interviews uploaded, but once I figure it out, then you will see all of the things that I promised in my last post!

One thing that didn’t make it into my earlier, problematic post was that on Sunday night, we had a great surprise at the Cinecon banquet–Debbie Reynolds showed up to honor Carleton Carpenter. By way of her usual Debbie Reynolds schtick, she made a lovely introduction to a man with whom she appeared in her first film, Two Weeks With Love.

Debbie Reynolds introducing Carleton Carpenter at the Cinecon banquet.

Afterward, I had the great honor to meet Debbie Reynolds, which had long been a dream of mine. She looked beautiful in a white pantsuit with a pink-tinged coat, and was very gracious to her fans. She kept insisting that this event was about Carleton, and not about her, which she was very noble of her to do.

Carleton Carpenter himself looked wonderful for 86 years old. We haven’t seen much of him since he left acting, and I would recognize him anywhere on the street–with his long, lean body and folksy accent, he is still the definition of the characters he portrayed onscreen. Other  honorees included Phyllis Coates and Richard L. Bare, and the other attendees included the likes of Julie Newmar, Rose Marie, and Theodore Bikel. I was very impressed with the stature of the audience. Aside from my accidentally blocking the view of one itinerant woman, who took the opportunity to tell me so in no uncertain terms, the evening went smoothly and I was overjoyed to be in the same room as some of the most enduring legends of the business.

Julie Newmar.

Rose Marie as Sally on The Dick Van Dyke Show.

Theodore Bikel in “My Fair Lady.”

Today, the big event was a tribute to Mack Sennett, For an hour and a half, we watched a great number of Mack Sennett shorts, including some rare, never-before-seen, and newly remastered clips. One reel, featuring outtakes from Water Nymphs and Bathing Beauties, was part of a private collection that has never been released, and it was fascinating to see the directors at work and the crowds that gathered to watch Mack Sennett film his movies. Watching crowd scenes in early impromptu filmmaking is something I love to do, because it is always interesting to think about what became of those people, how their lives turned out, when they were born and when they died. I was especially entranced with one child in the crowd during an outtake–the child must have been no more than 2, and was being held by her mother as she watched an actress strut across the stage. This short having been filmed in 1915, that child has now almost certainly lived her life and passed away. We see her shadow on film, a reminder that she was here and that she was once a 2-year-old child.

Some of the Mack Sennett “Bathing Beauties.”

The final film of the day was called Love Under Fire, starring Loretta Young and Don Ameche. Though the plot was clever in theory, that of a jewel thief (Young) who is courted by a member of Scotland Yard trying to arrest her, it played out in a bit of a hokey way, and I was left with the feeling that the movie was a bit of a cop-out. Still, Loretta Young is always so beautiful to look at, and she and Ameche are both capable in this movie.

And with that, Cinecon ended. I would like to thank Bob Birchard, the president of Cinecon, and the entire Cinecon staff for being present and helpful whenever I had a question. Thank you Marsha Hunt for showing me that you can be 95 and still look better than most people do at 25, and for being so sweet and kind, and thanks to Debbie Reynolds for well…being Debbie Reynolds. And finally, thanks to all with whom I had meaningful discussions and wonderful connections related to classic film. It was quite an event, and I can’t wait for next year!

Thanks for reading!

Cinecon Day 3: “Backstage on Broadway,” “Hot Water,” “Way Out West,” “The Covered Schooner,” “The Goose Woman,” “Walk, Don’t Run,” Bert Wheeler Home Movies, “Hips, Hips Hooray!” “Upstream,” “The Spider.”

Talking to my friend and fellow Cinecon attendee Kristen from Sales on Film yesterday regarding the best movie shown so far, I came up with two responses based on different criteria. The film that I found most enjoyable was Dollars and Sense from yesterday, as its inherent sweetness was appealing to me personally, and spoke to my own particular taste regardless of the relatively simplistic  filmmaking that it employed. What I consider to be the BEST film so far in terms of its skill in filmmaking, its creative storytelling, and its advanced humor, was Hot Water starring Harold Lloyd.

The story is about a young man whose wife asks him to pick up “a few things” from the grocery store, and rattles off about 15 specific items. At the grocery store, Harold wins a raffle for a turkey, so he now must carry home a flapping and wiggly bird to compound his already burdensome grocery load. Many comedic things happen to him on the trolley ride home with the turkey and his groceries, including repeatedly dropping all this things while looking for his fare, the turkey getting loose and hiding under a woman’s skirt, and a crab crawling from a young boy’s hand up Harold’s pant leg. It is a scene out of any piece of Harold Lloyd/Buster Keaton/Charlie Chaplin comedy from the 1920’s, but it is what happens next that sets this one apart.

We learn that Harold is buying a new car for his wife and is going to surprise her with it. He presents it to her when he gets home (“Fifty more payments and it’s ours!”) and proposes that they go out for a test run with her mother-in-law, whom he barely tolerates, his bum brother-in-law, and his belligerent nephew. What follows is an incredible comedic scene using the car as a prop–after a series of hilarious mishaps involving just about everyone in the car, the car is completely wrecked and has to be towed home.

At home, the mother-in-law goes down for a nap, and it is now that we learn that she has a problem with sleepwalking, unbeknownst to Harold. Harold discovers the nephew with a bottle of chloroform, about to put the family dog to sleep so he can “operate” on him. Harold panics and takes the bottle away, but keeps it in his pocket. At dinner, his mother-in-law becomes upset and Harold, fed up with her, furtively douses a handkerchief with chloroform to calm her down. She immediately calms, and then looks as though she has overdosed. The family takes her to bed, and when she realizes that Harold feels extremely guilty, she pretends to actually be dying. The scene is the climax of the entire movie, and concludes the story almost like a fireworks show of mistaken meanings, misunderstood situations, and a sleepwalking mother-in-law whom Harold construes to be her ghost. It is hilarious, and an absolute masterpiece of a scene.

I am not too familiar with Harold Lloyd films, but this one is a real gem. It plays out like a series of two-reelers, short films that come together to comprise a whole. One of my favorite moments is when the turkey, that we haven’t seen since the beginning of the film, randomly returns during the final scene and lands on Harold’s shoulder, making him think that is the nails of his dead mother-in-law digging into his shoulder. It works so well as comedy, because by this point we have completely forgotten about the turkey, and to see him come back really reminds us that this is a whole movie and ties the whole thing together.

This was my favorite film of the day, and the best of the festival so far. Other quality films of the day included Way Out West, a Laurel and Hardy feature, and The Goose Woman, featuring a brilliant dramatic performance by Louise Dresser. The man introducing the film noted that had the Academy Awards been around in 1925, Louise Dresser likely would have won the Academy Award hands-down. Indeed, she had all the qualities needed to win an Academy Award even today–she was not afraid to make herself look dowdy and dirty as a washed-up opera singer who had lost her voice due to the birth of her son about 20 years prior, and had turned to alcoholism. In addition to the physical transformation, she played the gamut of emotions from A to Z in this movie, and certainly deserved some acknowledgment. It’s a shame that the Oscars didn’t start until 1927.

Louise Dresser in “The Goose Woman.”

More on the films of today when I return this evening!

Cinecon Day 2: Symbolism and Metaphor in “Dangerous to Know” (1938), and Other Noteworthy Festival Events.

Anna May Wong and Akim Tamiroff in “Dangerous to Know” (1938).

The theme of this, the second day of Cinecon, seems to be a motif of masterfully crafted symbolism. I noticed the skill in the subtlety of metaphor first in Dangerous to Know, a surprisingly touching crime film starring Anna May Wong and Akim Tamiroff in the main roles. The movie is slow to start, and the plot is rather unclear, but about half an hour before the end of the film, the plot picked up so quickly that I was on the edge of my chair waiting to see what would happen.

The film is rare and, as far as I know, not commercially available, so I don’t feel too badly giving away plot points, but just in case you want to be warned, SPOILER ALERT.

Throughout the movie, the character of Lan Ying (played by Anna May Wong) is referred to as the “hostess” of noted gangster Steven Recka, but glances and innuendo from various characters makes it very clear that she is his girlfriend. Under the Hays Code, interracial dating was taboo, so any reference to love between them had to be relegated to innuendo, which in this case, makes the film much more ethereal and mysterious, adding to the already mysterious aura of Anna May Wong.

After a long spree of killing and kidnapping, Steven is unexpectedly called for drinks by Lan Ying, who pours drinks for herself and for him while maintaining a very calm, soft voice. When Steven tells her he thinks she’s acting strangely, she turns on a record, which happens to be a recording of “Thanks For the Memories.” With tears in her eyes, she drinks. Steven does not.

Steven then heads over to play the organ, a favorite hobby of his. As he plays, we see Lan Ying, situated behind his back, pull out a knife and start toward him. As she gets closer, she notices the tranquil look on his face as he plays. She puts her hand on his shoulder, and turns the knife toward herself. In a moment of supreme irony, she stabs herself in the stomach, committing suicide just at the moment a detective, who has been following Steven all through the movie, walks in the door. Naturally, he assumes that Lan Ying is just the latest in Steven’s string of murders, and carts him away to trial. As he goes, he gives funeral directions to the servants for Lan Ying. “She loved the Bach Largo,” he says, and instructs them to play that at the funeral. It is at once a sad and vindictive scene, as we have come to see Steven as a feeling person, but a criminal nonetheless and we are saddened to see him carted off for the suicide of his girlfriend, but happy that justice is being carried out for a murderer.

The first thing I would like to point out is that hara kiri (the act of suicide by way of stabbing oneself in the stomach) is hardly a new motif in the arts. In fact, the suicide of Lan Ying hearkened back to an exponentially more famous character, Cho-Cho-San from Puccini’s opera Madame Butterfly, who committed suicide in the same way. It is hardly speculation that the creators of this film fashioned this moment from Madame Butterfly, and certainly the Asian influence of both characters most likely inspired this aspect of the storyline. In pre-racially aware Hollywood, it was not uncommon to see stereotypes created of minorities from any and every source available, and in this case Anna May Wong, a third-generation California native from Los Angeles, was relegated to the demure Asian “Butterfly” stereotype that continues to permeate certain films to this day.

Anna May Wong in a typical role for her career.

After the movie, I had a discussion with the pianist who had played the score for the film, who happens to be an expert on organs. He informed me, much to my fascination, that the particular type of organ that the character of Steven plays at the end of the film, is designed for use at funerals. Thus, there is a subtle foreshadowing, reserved only for those who know music well, of what is to become of Lan Ying only moments later.

The film itself is filled with music. We know from the very beginning that Steven is a talented and and passionate musician, who always wished his life had ended up in such a way that he could pursue music as a profession instead of turning to a life of crime. It is thus further significant that the “Butterfly” character be implied through the suicide of Lan Ying, as the musical theme continues through the plot line even in covert ways.

Maria Callas’ recording of the role of Cho-Cho-San in “Madame Butterfly.”

When this movie started, I was prepared not to like it, and truth be told the first hour left a lot to be desired. But the ending turned it completely around for me, and when I reflect on the film hours later, I remember it as a fascinating and enjoyable hour and a half.

I leave you with some other highlights of the day:

  • Jane Withers and Marsha Hunt showed up for the screening of Gentle Julia, and after the film was over, I was saddened to see that the entire audience was flocking to Jane Withers and Marsha Hunt, who was wonderful in the film and just as beautiful today at 95 as she was at age 17 in the film, was essentially left without acknowledgment. I wanted to show her how much I appreciated her, so I approached her and expressed my thanks for her attendance, and remarked on her extraordinary beauty. We ended up talking for a good 10 minutes about the film, her memories, and her career. I am extraordinarily grateful for that and impressed with her lovely personality and sweet, modest nature. She told me that she and Jane were initially asked to have an interview, but they ran out of time.

  • One screening, Dollars and Sense, was one of the sweetest, most feel-good movies I have ever seen. It concerned a young baker who did nothing but good, and a woman comes in one day and is so taken by his generosity that she wants to work with him at the bakery. One day, he gave away so much bread that the stress of it made him ill. The woman nurses him back to health and with the help of a benefactor, helps recover his business from the debt of the bread and pays all his hospital bills. In return, the benefactor requests that she come to his apartment to “repay” him. He sends a note to David, implying an affair with the girl he had come to fall in love with. The purpose was to anger David and make him come to his apartment. Reading the note, this tireless do-gooder finally does get angry, and marches up to the benefactor’s apartment demanding an explanation. The benefactor replies that the woman is to be married. David exclaims “To you??” And the benefactor answers “No…to you.” He had arranged a marriage between Hazel and David. It was just the most lovely story, almost like a fairy tale, and so refreshing to see a character who seemed to be the antagonist turn out to be the hero of the whole story.

More tomorrow!

Cinecon Day 1: Nicholas Brothers Short, “Artistry in Rhythm,” “Always A Bridesmaid,” “Drums of Jeopardy”

The Nicholas Brothers in their “Lucky Number” dance routine.

As of 7:00 this evening, Cinecon is officially underway. The festivities started with a great last-minute surprise–a Nicholas Brothers short that had not been listed in the program came on the screen, and two women came up and did the entire routine with the taps perfectly in sync. At first I thought it was just meant to show off a foley effect, but after the routine was over, Cinecon president Bob Birchard introduced the women as “the Nicholas Sisters.” We had been watching the granddaughters of Fayard Nicholas, one half of the famed child prodigy dancing duo, dance along to a clip that their grandfather had made 80 years ago. It was a wonderful thing to watch, and a lovely addition to the schedule.

The regularly scheduled programming began with “Artistry in Rhythm,” a Stan Kenton musical review starring Anita O’Day and a few sister acts along with Stan Kenton and his orchestra. It was a very simple, basic review, lasting no more than 10 minutes and specifically spotlighting the talents of Anita O’Day. For what it was, it was good and it worked as a nice introduction to Always a Bridesmaid.

All right everyone, so anyone who knows me well knows that I absolutely ADORE The Andrews Sisters. When I was a kid, people would ask me what my favorite band was, expecting any of the normal pre-teen answers of the 90’s–but my answer was always “The Andrews Sisters,” and I stand by that. I think they’re magnificent. There was just something about how their voices meshed together to create this almost unearthly sound that is just right for the ear, and to me, is exactly what sister groups should sound like.

That said, Always a Bridesmaid is a TERRIBLE MOVIE, and not even the magical trio of Patty, Maxene and Laverne can save it. The plot is entirely non-existent, the script is ridiculous and there were scenes at which I literally cringed due to the corny dialogue or hokey situation the characters found themselves in. I lived for the moments when Patty, Maxene and Laverne would come out and do a number because really, it was a respite from the rest of the film. But no matter how deep my love for The Andrews Sisters, I have to be honest in my opinion that they are meant for radio and records–not the screen. Patty Andrews, the youngest Andrews Sister, is fun to watch (and to listen to, because she has this great scratchy speaking voice that I wouldn’t expect from her), and in one particular scene she proves herself to be a phenomenal dancer. The other two, unfortunately, tend to fade into the background, which is a recurring theme in the career of these three women. Maxene and Laverne are said to have resented Patty for always being the center of attention, the youngest and most talented of the sisters. They fought often, and ultimately broke up after Patty ventured into a career on her own. After performing as a duo with Maxene for several years, LaVerne succumbed to cancer at the age of 55, while Maxene went on to a teaching career. Today, Patty Andrews is the sole surviving sister; at 94, she lives quiet life at her home in Northridge, CA.

The Andrews Sisters sing their most famous song “The Boogie Woogie Bugle Boy of Company B.”

The Drums of Jeopardy, a silent from 1923, was an interesting contrast to Always a Bridesmaid and “Artistry in Rhythm.” This is a story of intrigue and crime revolving around a set of Indian jewels, and the film features a very early appearance of Wallace Beery, who would become famous later as a film star and a radio star.  It is a compelling piece, and despite my extremely tired state by this point, I was drawn toward it and wanted desperately to watch it. Clocking in at a mere 76 minutes, this is a film that truly makes good use of time. The production team used exactly time they needed, not a second less, not a second more. It felt satisfying, as the time was exactly right to tell the story completely.

Now off to bed. More tomorrow!

Cinecon is here!

Well friends, it’s 3:45 in the morning and I am off to Cinecon! I have enabled the live twitter feed on the right hand side of the page so you may follow along and get minute-by-minute updates on all the festivities.

Again, if you are in the L.A. area, drop by and say hello! This promises to be quite an event.

Talk to you from L.A.!

Summer Under the Stars Blogathon: “San Francisco” (1936)

Jeanette MacDonald singing “Nearer My God to Thee” with survivors of the 1906 earthquake in “San Francisco” (1936).

As a native of the San Francisco Bay Area, this film has always held a special place in my heart. The story is of a young singer, Mary Blake (MacDonald), who emigrates to California just prior to the San Francisco earthquake of 1906, and is torn between two venues–the lower-class Barbary Coast, run by “Blackie” Norton (Clark Gable) and the Tivoli Opera House, for which her classically trained voice is better suited. She is also torn romantically between the operators of the two venues, and the beginning of the movie is dedicated to her exploration of this conflict within herself.

The story is nothing special, it has been done in different ways many times before and the only thing that really makes it stand out is Jeanette MacDonald’s famous soprano voice, singing operatic arias at Tivoli, and the jazzy tune “San Francisco” at Blackie Norton’s.”San Francisco,” by the way, has become one of the official anthems of the city, and has been covered by countless artists over the years since this film’s release. Here is a video of Jeanette singing the song in the movie.

I sincerely apologize for the quality of this particular video, specifically the advertisement at the beginning and the coloration of the film. This is the only video on the internet of this number as it exists in the film, and I am unable to upload a more quality one on my outdated computer. So this will have to do.

What I would like to focus on is not the story, not the songs (though admittedly Jeanette MacDonald is a highly accomplished classical singer, and it is a joy to watch her), but rather the final 15 minutes of the movie. As Mary Blake performs at Blackie’s, the earth begins to shake, first a little, then violently as glasses break, chandeliers fall, and the entirety of the audience flees for their lives and people pour into the streets. What follows is the most lavishly constructed disaster scene in a film up to that point, and if I do say so myself, one of the most technically advanced disaster scenes of any decade (adjusting for technology available at the time of filming, of course). With the use of quick cuts at the height of the earthquake sequence, followed by long, wide shots at the end, director W.S. Van Dyke succeeds in evoking a crippling sense of panic and fear followed by an almost serene surveying of the damage and loss of life, key real life emotions in the wake of any disaster.

In this video, pay close attention to the shaking ground. That was not trick camerawork, as would have been employed in earlier films–the production designer, Slavko Vorkapich, created a set that rocked and shook, simulating the strength and damage the earthquake wrought 30 years prior in real time. The crumbling San Francisco buildings were dollhouse miniatures shot from below in order to make them look like tall structures capable of the damage Van Dyke sought to replicate.

The earthquake starts at 1:03.

It is clear just how much future disaster films took from this scene. From Earthquake (1972), which employed the same rocking set that Vorkapich created for San Francisco, straight down to the epic Titanic (1997), which contains a scene in which a mast falls crashing onto a civilian almost identical to what occurs at 2:30 in the video above.

The final scene of the film is one in that, no matter how many times I watch this movie, never fails to give me goosebumps. High above the city in the evacuation tents, Mary Blake sings the spiritual “Nearer My God to Thee” a capella with the survivors of the earthquake. It is a somber melody that echoes the melancholy felt at the loss of all that was precious to them. Soon, a messenger announces that the fire following the earthquake has been extinguished. Amidst cheers and choruses of “We’ll build a new San Francisco!” all their cares melt away as they march proudly back to the city, singing a joyful rendition of “Battle Hymn of the Republic.” The film ends on a note of hope and optimism for what the future holds for this city and all those who reside there.

The theme of eternal hope in the wake of a disaster is sure to pack a punch for anyone, but as a native of the San Francisco Bay, this scene is especially powerful emotionally. To know that this tells the story of your own history and your own identity, evokes a very special and indescribable sense of belonging and ownership of the tale. Each time I watch this film, my love and pride for San Francisco is renewed, and that is a unique connection that can’t be quantified.

Here is a link to the last scene of the film, and I have followed it with pictures of San Francisco as it looked after the earthquake, juxtaposed with images of San Francisco today.

Click here to watch the ending of San Francisco on the official TCM website.

Upper Market Street during the fire that raged after the earthquake in 1906.

Upper Market Street today.

Lotta’s Fountain, the official meeting place for families searching for loved ones during the 1906 earthquake.

Lotta’s Fountain today. Every year at 5:12 am (the time of the initial shock) on the anniversary of the earthquake, a ceremony is held here in remembrance of the victims and in honor of the survivors.

The Ferry Building was miraculously untouched during the earthquake. Here is a sharp contrast between the untouched Ferry Building in the background and a completely destroyed building in the foreground.

The Ferry Building as it looks today, a real monument to San Francisco. Today it not only serves as the port for ferries to and from Marin County, but boasts a popular array of shops and restaurants inside.

Summer Under the Stars Blogathon: “Ball of Fire” (1941)

While browsing through the Summer Under the Stars lineup for today, I saw that Ball of Fire, a delightfully unique screwball comedy with one very catchy musical number that I find myself singing often, was on tap for this evening. I knew that I had to write an entry on it, as it is indeed a fascinating film and ahead of its time in many ways. Dealing at once with intellectualism, gangsters, burlesque, and romance, featuring a snappy script complete with endless slang terms from the era, Ball of Fire is a movie lover’s smorgasbord, with a little something to suit everyone’s taste!

The story begins as a group of aging college professors, living together in a large house, try to complete an encyclopedia that they have started. Professor Bertram Potts (Gary Cooper) is writing an entry on modern slang, and to conduct research and gather participants for his study, he ventures out into the dingier parts of the city–pool halls, bars, anywhere where lower vernacular might be used. One of these establishments is a burlesque hall, wherein he sees a young dancer sing a sensual number called “Drumboogie.”

The drummer here is making a cameo appearance. Widely known and popular for their big band sound, this is the famous Gene Krupa and his orchestra. One of my favorite parts of the whole movie is how Krupa plays the matchbox like a drum at the end of this video, as the rest of the audience whispers the song. It reminds me of something Bob Fosse might have dreamed up some 30 years later.

With this number enters the character of Sugarpuss O’Shea (Barbara Stanwyck), with whom Professor Potts is very taken for her prolific use of slang. He decides to go backstage and ask Sugarpuss if she would be willing to take part in his project, but as we soon learn, Sugarpuss is a gangster’s moll whose boyfriend, Joe Lilac, is being linked to a murder case. When she hears a man knocking on the door wanting to talk to her, she is convinced that it is in relation to Joe and talks to Professor Potts in a very suspicious way. He is entranced with her usage of slang and though she keeps telling him she is not interested (“Shove in your clutch” is a phrase Professor Potts is most taken with), he leaves his card for her in case she ever is.

Those protecting Joe Lilac are concerned that if Sugarpuss were to go back to her apartment, the police would find her and make her talk. As they try to think about where to put her for the night so the police won’t know her whereabouts, Sugarpuss pulls out Professor Potts’ card, and the decision is made for her to go there for the night. She goes under the guise of being legitimately interested in Professor Potts’ investigation, and ends up staying much longer than the initial night.

Meanwhile, Joe Lilac is poised to marry her due to the fact that she wouldn’t be forced to testify against him. The protectors show up with a huge engagement ring, and though they downplay the not having to testify bit (one of my favorite lines is “He gets more bang outta you than any girl he ever met!”), it is clear that avoiding prosecution is his primary motive. However, what complicates things is that Professor Potts is beginning to fall in love with her. Eventually, the professor proposes and Sugarpuss is officially engaged to two men.

Through a series of circumstances, Sugarpuss is driven to Joe to be married along with Professor Potts and the rest of the professors in the house, but they all, including Professor Potts, think that Sugarpuss and the professor are going to be the ones having the wedding, not Sugarpuss and Joe. Once the professor finds out, he leaves Sugarpuss in anger and she is forced toward Joe. By this point, Sugarpuss really has fallen for the professor, and how exactly she gets out of her entanglement with Joe is what takes up the last 15 minutes of the movie.

I don’t usually like to spend too much time rehashing a film’s plot, preferring to leave more room for analysis, but the way this film unravels is truly like yarn–one thing leads to another, and in order to bring the character of the film into focus, the details of the plot are important to impart. In fact, the route of this plot is very typical of the comedies of Billy Wilder, who co-wrote the screenplay. When Ball of Fire is compared to a later Billy Wilder film such as Some Like it Hot (1959), the way the story unfolds is very similar.

Though today is technically Gary Cooper day on TCM, I think this is Barbara Stanwyck’s film, through and through. The real-life Barbara Stanwyck was a tough Brooklyn gal who grew up in poverty on the streets of New York, and that common slang of Sugarpuss O’Shea was her own way of speaking. I don’t think anyone else in Hollywood at that time could have been better for the part. The way she carries herself and even the way she walks is pitch perfect for the part she plays.

Stanwyck as a young girl in Brooklyn.

The others who steal the show are the absolutely adorable professors who share the house with Bertram Potts. Played notably by S.Z. “Cuddles” Sakall, Henry Travers, and Richard Haydn, they do such things as mapping out the steps to the conga through an algorithm, and after crashing the car into a sign, explaining that by the theory of relativity that it was the sign who crashed into them. The presence of Sugarpuss in the professors’ house was supposed to be reminiscent of Snow White and the Seven Dwarves, and the professors certainly honed the sweet and slightly otherworldly quality of the dwarves.

I get a huge kick out of this movie, and truth be told I have never met one person who didn’t love it. It’s just one of those movies that is universally liked and appreciated. If you haven’t seen it, it plays on TCM fairly frequently.

Here is Sugarpuss O’Shea in a great scene teaching the professors how to dance the conga. Thanks for reading! And don’t forget to tune in later this week for my coverage of Cinecon, starting Thursday. I’ll enable live-tweeting again, as I think that was a good way to keep you informed up to the minute!

Enjoy!

Gene Kelly’s 100th Birthday: “Cover Girl” (1944)

Today marks what would have been the 100th birthday of dancer, choreographer, director extraordinaire, the incomparable Gene Kelly, to whom a tribute on this blog is long overdue. Gene Kelly was one of the most important personages in the creation of the classic MGM musical, and his talents went far beyond mere film dancing. He was behind the scenes in nearly every capacity, as director, producer, and choreographer, and it seems that nearly every significant musical in our culture has Gene Kelly’s name on it somewhere. Along with Fred Astaire, he defined screen dance, and unlike Astaire, he emphasized the fun, athletic form of dance with his large, loose movements and effortless flexibility. He once said “If Fred Astaire is the Cary Grant of dance, I’m the Marlon Brando.”

TCM has been paying tribute to Kelly all day as part of their Summer Under the Stars lineup, and a review of Cover Girl, one of my all-time favorite Gene Kelly movies, is how I will salute him here. In addition to the Gene Kelly classics An American in Paris and Singin’ in the Rain, this beautiful treasure of a film deservedly occupies a prime spot in tonight’s schedule.

Initially conceived as a showcase for Rita Hayworth, Columbia’s shining star, the film’s plot revolves around a chorus girl, Rusty Parker, who through a series of circumstances wins a spot on the cover of a magazine. It turns out that she looks exactly like her grandmother, who 40 years ago had had a romance with the magazine editor. She is reluctant to leave her job as a chorus girl, due to her relationship with the club owner, Danny Maguire (Gene Kelly), but Danny doesn’t want to hold her back, so he picks a fight with her so she will accept the magazine cover job. She eventually becomes a big star and becomes entrenched in her fame, but links to her humble roots keep drawing her back to Danny.

The supporting cast features some of the best character actors around, notably Phil Silvers as another performer in Danny Maguire’s nightclub, and Eve Arden as the magazine editor’s wisecracking assistant. They add a much-needed touch of wit and sarcasm to the mix–without them, I think, the story would be too flat to work as well as it does. Rita Hayworth is in her element in this movie, outfitted in fantastic gowns by Travis Banton and lit by some of the loveliest Technicolor ever used up to that point.

There is, however, one scene that always makes me cringe for Rita–at one point, upon learning that the magazine editor wants a quiet model, a jealous chorus girl makes Rusty pretend to be jumpy, spastic, loud, and obnoxious character and tells her that’s what the magazine is looking for. Knowing the story of Rita Hayworth and her shyness, how she struggled in her early years simply to be heard on film, often breaking down in tears of frustration, I can only imagine how extraordinarily difficult that scene must have been for her. Every time I watch it, I feel a little bit of anger at the cruelty of making Rita play that scene. However, I can’t get too mad at the director (Charles “King” Vidor), because obviously he and Hayworth worked well together–two years later, he directed her in her most famous and celebrated film, Gilda (1946), an incredibly different film necessitating a completely different approach.

“King” Vidor’s direction of Cover Girl…

“King” Vidor’s direction of Gilda.

Hayworth essentially plays a dual role in Cover Girl–playing Rusty’s lookalike grandmother in flashback sequences. Unfortunately this didn’t give Rita much opportunity for versatility, as the whole point was to make her as much like Rusty as possible, but it certainly did allow the designer, Travis Banton, to experiment with styles from the beginning of the century, such as this completely outrageous number that oddly works:

As for Gene Kelly, this was the true beginning of Gene Kelly’s career as a star. He made his film debut only two years earlier, in the Judy Garland musical For Me and My Gal (1942), and his career had been on a steady rise, but it wasn’t until this movie was released that his fame began to skyrocket. One of the highlights of the film is a cinematic trick that would be the first, but certainly not the last, experiment in stretching the limits of film in Gene Kelly’s career–a dance with his own alter-ego.

Later the same year, Kelly again famously chose an alternative dancing partner:

This film achieved far more than its goal–if Columbia simply wanted to make a box-office hit to cement the star power of Rita Hayworth, they got their wish. But in the process, the success of the film served as a springboard for one of the most important figures in all of film. For that, we owe Cover Girl a lot.

Cinecon Schedule, August 30-September 3, 2012

“Always a Bridesmaid” is one of the featured films at Cinecon 48, held this Labor Day weekend in Hollywood.

As many of you know, I will be attending Cinecon 48, a large festival honoring rare and lesser-seen classic films over Labor Day weekend in Hollywood. The schedule has recently been released, and it includes a number of treasures that I am very excited to see! So if you happen to be in the area, come check it out. It promises to be a marvelous festival!

Here is the schedule, as published on Cinecon’s website:

Thursday August 30
7:00 ARTISTRY IN RHYTHM (Universal 1944) 16 min
Stan Kenton and his orchestra.
Print courtesy of NBCUniversal
7:30 ALWAYS A BRIDESMAID (Universal, 1943) 62 min
The Andrews Sisters give out with the jive, and everything’s reet, neat and petit in this toe-tapping B musical which also features Grace McDonald, Charles Butterworth and Billy Gilbert.
Print courtesy of NBCUniversal
8:45 DRUMS OF JEOPARDY (Truart, 1923) 75 min
Many are likely to be familiar with the 1931 talkie remake, The Drums of Jeopardy, but here’s the silent original, based on a novel by Harold McGrath, and featuring Elaine Hammerstein, Jack Mulhall and Wallace Beery.
Print courtesy of the Library of Congress
10:15 15 MAIDEN LANE (20th Century-Fox, 1936) 64 min
Director Allan Dwan brings his usual sense of pacing and good humor to this tale of–well, jewel robbery, domestic intrigue, amateur and professional detectives, and murder starring Lloyd Nolan and past Cinecon guest Claire Trevor and Cesar Romero.
Print courtesy of 20th Century Fox
Friday August 31
9:00 TBA 10 min
9:15 DANGEROUS TO KNOW (Paramount, 1938) 70 min
Anna May Wong is best-remembered for her roles in The Thief of Bagdad (1924) and In Old San Francisco (1927)–but it was in the late 1930s in a series of oddball “B” movies for Paramount like Daughter of, King of Chinatown, Island of Lost Men, and this kinky underworld tale, that Anna May Wong became a star. Don’t know how this one flew under the radar of the Production Code Authority, but it plays more like a 1933 screen excursion than a post Legion of Decency effort.
Print courtesy of NBCUniversal
10:40 DOLLARS AND SENSE (Goldwyn, 1920) 60 min
Time and nitrate film have not treated Madge Kennedy well. She starred in nearly thirty silents before returning to the stage, and much fewer than a handful are known to survive today. This screening offers an opportunity the work of a legendary American star.
Print courtesy the Library of Congress
11:45 GROOVIE MOVIE (M-G-M, 1944) 10 min
A Pete Smith Specialty featuring the jitterbug dance antics of Arthur Walsh and our guest Jean Veloz.
Print courtesy of Warner Bros. and the Warner Archive Collection
12:00 Lunch Break
2:00 YOU’RE NEXT (Jester, 1919) 20 min
Behind the scenes with forgotten comic Marcel Perez.
Print courtesy of the Library of Congress
2:20 WILD BILL HICKCOK (Hart-Paramount, 1923) 60 min
One of William S. Hart’s final films, Wild Bill Hickok also marked the only time the Western star portrayed an historical person of the Old West– although, in truth, the cowboy star played fast and loose with historical fact when concocting this biopic.
Print courtesy of the Museum of Modern Art
3:45 GENTLE JULIA (20th Century-Fox, 1936) 63 min
Marsha Hunt plays Julia in this adaptation of Booth Tarkington’s 1922 novel about a flirtatious Midwestern belle, although truth be told the scenario was tweaked to feature the shenanigans of Julia’s kid niece, Florence, played by Jane Withers. The talented though largely forgotten John G. Blystone directed this modest gem, his reputation hampered by his early death in 1938 at age 45 long before auteurists could notice him.
Print courtesy of 20th Century Fox
5:00 SENSATION SEEKERS (Universal, 1927) 80 min
Lois Weber was one of the few women to carve out a lengthy and prestigious career behind the megaphone in the silent era. In this, Weber’s penultimate outing and her last silent film as a director, Billie Dove plays a jazz-age mama who finds true love in unexpected places.
Print courtesy of NBCUniversal
6:30 Dinner Break
8:00 BILLY AND HIS PAL (G. Melies, 1910) 10 min
Preserved by The Museum of Modern Art with support from the National Film Preservation Fund.
8:10 DIAMOND JIM (Universal, 1935) 93 min
A rarely-seen biopic about the Gilded Age’s most famous citizen, Diamond Jim Brady, featuring Edward Arnold in the role he was born to play, is surrounded by a great supporting cast including Tully Marshall, William Demarest, Henry Kolker, Eric Blore, and Jean Arthur, who plays the two lost loves in Brady’s life.
Print courtesy of NBCUniversal
9:50 BLONDE OR BRUNETTE (Paramount, 1927) 65 min
Disgusted with Paris flappers, Adolphe Menjou heads to the country to find the girl of his dreams (Greta Nissen), only to have her all under the influence of a fast young lady (Arlette Marchal), who influences the girl to take up smoking, short skirts and the Black Bottom. The change sets Adolphe on edge, but he’s already married the girl, so what’s he to do?
Print courtesy of the Library of Congress
11:05 GIRL OVERBOARD (Universal, 1937) 58 min
Murder, false accusations, assumed identities not to mention a girl overboard as the title promises, and you have an hour of B-movie excitement with past Cinecon honoree, Gloria Stuart, Walter Pidgeon, and future TV travelogue host Billy Burrud.
Print courtesy of NBCUniversal
Saturday September 1
9:00 TBA 10 min
9:10 HOT WATER (Harold Lloyd Corp.-Pathé, 1924) 55 min
Harold Lloyd’s shortest feature among the films he produced himself, Hot Water plays like a series of two-reelers, and has several times been truncated (by Lloyd himself and by Time-Life Films) with the final segment jettisoned because it is not easily excerpted–but, in fact, the first two-thirds of the picture are really a prologue and set-up for one of Lloyd’s most sustained and hilarious screen sequences.
Print courtesy of Harold Lloyd Entertainment
10:20 WAY OUT WEST (Hal Roach-MGM, 1937) 64 min
Although a “warhorse” if there ever was one, this Stan Laurel & Oliver Hardy comic masterwork is rarely revived in 35mm in a theatrical setting. Be prepared to laugh and to learn about UCLA’s Laurel & Hardy restoration project.
35mm preservation print courtesy of the UCLA Film & Television Archive and Sonar Entertainment
11:30 Lunch Break
1:30 TBA 20 min
1:50 THE GOOSE WOMAN (Universal, 1925) 85 min
Louise Dresser portrays a once-famous opera star who has lost her voice from complications related to the birth of her illegitimate son, played by Jack Pickford. The plot involves murder and false accusations–the standard stuff of melodrama- -but it is so brilliantly handled by director Clarence Brown that The Goose Woman is regarded as one of the true classics of the silent screen.
35mm preservation print courtesy of the UCLA Film & Television Archive and NBCUniversal
3:30 WALK, DON’T RUN (Columbia, 1966) 114 min
Cinecon guest Samantha Eggar co-stars with Cary Grant in his final screen appearance. Set during the 1964 Tokyo Olympics, Walk, Don’t Run is a remake and updating of the classic World War II-era screwball comedy The More the Merrier.
Print courtesy of Sony Pictures
5:24 Q & A with Samantha Eggar
6:00 Dinner Break
7:30 BERT WHEELER HOME MOVIES 10 min
7:45 HIPS, HIPS, HOORAY! (Radio Pictures, 1934) 68 min
Bert Wheeler and Robert Woolsey, with able support from Dorothy Lee, Thelma Todd and Ruth Etting keep on doin’ what they’re doin’ as lipstick salesmen who help to keep romance alive.
Print courtesy of Warner Bros.
9:10 UPSTREAM (Fox, 1927) 65 min
One of a number of American silents repatriated from New Zealand by the National Film Preservation Foundation, this previously “lost” John Ford film explores life among vaudevillians who reside in a theatrical boardinghouse and what happens when one of their number gets plucked from obscurity to play Hamlet on the London stage because of his family’s respected name in theatrical history.
A collaboration of the New Zealand Film Archive/Ng a Kaitiaki O Ng a Taonga Whiti a hua, the American archival community, and the National Film Preservation Foundation. Preserved through a collaboration of Twentieth Century Fox and the Academy of Motion Picture Arts and Sciences. Print courtesy of the Academy Film Archive.
10:30 THE SPIDER (20th Century-Fox, 1945) 62 min
Charles Fulton Oursler and Lowell Brentano’s 1927 the play, The Spider, got the expressionist treatment from Fox and William Cameron Menzies in 1931 (screened at Cinecon 30 in 1994), and in this re-make the play gets a film noir makeover from director Richard Webb. Richard Conte and Faye Marlowe star in this dark tale of a man accused of a murder he did not commit.
Print courtesy of 20th Century Fox
Sunday September 2
9:00 TBA 10 min
9:10 THE BEDROOM WINDOW (Paramount, 1924) 75 min
May McAvoy, Malcolm MacGregor and Ricardo Cortez in a tale of murder, false accusation and amateur sleuthing made under the guidance of Cecil’s older brother, William C. deMille.
Print courtesy of the Library of Congress
10:35 SO YOU WANT TO KNOW ABOUT JOE McDOAKES? includes Q & A with Richard L. Bare and Phyllis Coates
Cinecon honorees Phyllis Coates and writer-director Richard L. Bare reunite to recall their long series of Joe McDoakes comedies and their associations with such classic TV series as The Adventures of Superman and Green Acres.
Courtesy Warner Bros.
11:45 Lunch Break
1:45 THE CIRCUS MAN (Lasky, 1914) 50 min
This story of a falsely accused murderer hiding out as a circus clown is based on the novel The Rose in the Ring by George Barr McCutcheon, with a scenario by Cecil B. DeMille–anticipating the Jimmy Stewart sub-plot in The Greatest Show on Earth. With Theodore Roberts, Mabel Van Buren and Jody Mullally.
Print courtesy of the Library of Congress
2:45 FEARLESS FAGAN (M-G-M, 1952) 80 min
Cinecon honoree Carleton Carpenter joins us for the story of a lion, and the young man who loved him. Stanley Donen (fresh from co-directing Singin’ in the Rain) wielded the megaphone on this supposedly true story about a circus clown who takes his pet lion to boot camp when he’s forced to enlist. Past Cinecon honoree Janet Leigh co-stars.
Courtesy Warner Bros.
4:05 Q & A with Carleton Carpenter
5:00 THE BLUFF (American-Mutual, 1915) 60 min
While attempting to turn base metals into gold, crazy experimenters Clarence Kolb and Max Dill (the west coast equivalents of Weber and Fields) strike it rich when they accidentally invent a puncture-proof tire.
Print courtesy of the Library of Congress
7:00 COCKTAIL RECEPTION
8:00 BANQUET
Monday September 3
9:00 TBA 10 min
9:10 HELLO, EVERYBODY! (Paramount, 1933) 75 min
A musical drama designed to exploit the appeal of radio sensation Kate Smith. Randolph Scott plays the guy Kate loves from afar, but he’s got a yen for Kate’s sister, played by Sally Blane. Shakespeare it ain’t, but the film does offer a very real sense of the sensation that the “songbird of the air waves” created in the early 1930s after first gaining modest attention on Broadway and records.
Print courtesy of NBCUniversal
10:35 LADIES’ NIGHT IN A TURKISH BATH (First National, 1928) 71 min
To avoid being pinched in a police raid on a speakeasy, “Speed” Dawson (Jack Mulhall) and Pa Slocum (James Finlayson) duck into a Turkish bath only to discover that its ladies’ night and their wives (Dorothy Mackaill and Sylvia Ashton) are there, too!
35mm preservation print courtesy of the UCLA Film & Television Archive and Warner Bros.
11:45 Lunch Break
1:30 MACK SENNETT CENTENNIAL TRIBUTE 75 min
Film historian and preservationist Paul Gierucki offers an advance peak at his soon-to-be-released Mack Sennett Centennial Collection.
3:00 SHE WANTED A MILLIONAIRE (Fox, 1932) 74 min
A Pre-Code drama in which beauty contest winner Joan Bennett forsakes newspaperman Spencer Tracy for millionaire James Kirkwood but the millionaire winds up dead after attempting to murder his wife by feeding her to a pack of dogs!
35mm preservation print courtesy of the UCLA Film & Television Archive and 20th Century Fox
4:30 STRAWBERRY ROAN (Universal, 1933) 62 min
Wild Western action as rough-ridin’ Ken Maynard attempts to tame a wild horse while rounding up rustlers along the way.
Print courtesy of NBCUniversal
5:45 LOVE UNDER FIRE (20th Century-Fox, 1937) 75 min
Jewel robbery, foreign intrigue, undercover operatives, and Borrah Minevitch and his Gang of harmonica rascals come together in this screwball-romance-thriller set against the Spanish Civil War. Loretta Young and Don Ameche star, directed by the often under-rated George Marshall.
Print courtesy of 20th Century Fox
We do our best to stick to the schedule, but changes and delays are inevitable.
SPECIAL PROGRAMS
Mt. Olympus Room 3rd floor Loews Hollywood Hotel
Thursday August 30
5:00 PM   The Jew and his Music II. – Presented by Murray Glass. (90 mins.)

Friday August 31
9:00 AM   Looking for Mabel Normand with Documentary Director Anthony Mercaldi. (50 mins.)

Saturday September 1

3:30 PM   Palace of Silents with Documentary Director Iain Kennedy. (80 mins.)

Sunday, September 2
1:30 PM   Peter Ford: A Little Prince with Documentary Director Alex Roman. Plus: Special Guest Peter Ford (45 Mins.)